}
!
in
this way;
I hope that the Crown Colonies will not be
Wped in
HBz
2714
Mr Just
mi Hancant
C.P.L.
Dr. Robinson,
$27
27.
(
M.Pd. 27
H
Please see the note from Mr. Neish anexed to this paper in which it appears that it is the wish of the Lord Chancellor that Mr. Harcourt should take the opinion of the
Cabinet on this question.
By direction of Ir. Just I submit a brief narrative
of the facts for consideration and for circulation to the
Cabinet if considered desirable.
A.B.K.
Cartea Dypt 9: Stable
April 28th.
You Theme's see this as it allsets It Ilong and Sania apes and an will considerpetice lie last paragraph ufecially weeds Conectern
ad any
I see no particules obj or to either proposal. Sir J. Anderson perfores murely to movere an already existing penalty. It Kong's dft will p. make it an offence to personat
abat personation with a view to the exissention
&
ا تو تھی
of the personator. Do für
Wd. simply
mean the
penalty for
160
a I can judge this
the definiti snactment &
a misdemeanour which
punished (ma
Cam
be
some that wound about
process) ander the existing low. Aut for
the present at best, Won't think sitter
Colony
신
sts go further than the proport
A
Thas no don't that (hieve ferling in ctkong
is just austing
A
i
Spare anthe subject
the Motration Acts.
for Cox
J Aran
I suggest
mems
ང
R 20
rather frightmed about this
sentia
p.
3 of Keitten-
Boycotts have a tendang to spread & through
it dosn't matter t
V-p
whether the Straits Chinare
boycott Australian brade or not
it matters a
great deal whether they deal with focal Britain or with Grmany. I think it is most
A
desirable thate
مشكا
point.
the Cabinet sud not oricook
They Hang Hing law does not seen ofjentimable but I shines have throught-
in
that it was
scarcely the proper function gttre Hong Kong for! deal with such
ther interfence may bring
Castro
a
dr
share of the indignatio felt among the thiimise on accant othe
Australian laws. After all, Australia could easily deal witte persmation costo
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.